Home / What a language model is, without the jargon
One family of models, a choice between speed and depth
The models within the same family share the same base training and really only differ in the trade-off between how fast the answer comes and how deep the reasoning applied before answering goes.
Claude exists as four distinct models at the time of writing, Fable 5.1, Opus 5, Sonnet 5 and Haiku 4.5. All four come out of the same base training and are mainly distinguished by a single setting, the trade-off between how fast the answer comes and how deep the reasoning applied before answering goes.
A common foundation, a different slider
Choosing a model amounts to moving a slider, not changing tools. At one end, a model answers within seconds and suits short, repeated tasks, an acknowledgement of receipt, a rewording, a sort of messages. At the other end, a model takes longer because it chains more reasoning steps before concluding, which matters for a file that needs cross checking or a plan that needs verifying on several points. The documentation published by Anthropic recommends starting with Opus 5 for most uses, and reserving Fable 5.1 for tasks that demand demanding reasoning or that stretch across many chained steps.
A concrete example helps to feel the difference. Here are two requests the same volunteer might make on the same day.
Short request: rewrite this welcome message in three warmer sentences.
Long request: compare the twelve quotes received this quarter, flag the most
significant price differences and propose a reasoned ranking.
The first task is handled within seconds by a fast model. The second benefits from being given to a model that takes the time to cross check the figures before concluding.
The price follows the same trade-off
The price charged per million words exchanged varies strongly from one model to another, and this variation follows exactly the same axis as speed, the deepest model costs the most, the fastest costs the least. The figure below reproduces these four published prices, with their source and date, rather than copying them here where they would go out of date without anyone noticing.
Remembering the exact names matters less than remembering the principle: a deeper model is not a model that answers every request better, it is a model that answers better those requests that need several reasoning steps. The choice of model, covered here, acts on a first lever. The next lesson shows a second one, independent of this one: the order of words within a single message.
The entry price per million words exchanged, by model
The entry price of the four models, compared
A volunteer at an association sets up her conversational assistant with the fastest model in the range to prepare, within seconds each, the short replies sent every morning to membership requests received through the association's inbox.
Write in one sentence what this situation establishes, and in one sentence what it does not establish.
What this establishes: This choice pairs a task of short, repeated replies with the model the family presents as the fastest, which matches the use case this tier is recommended for.
What this does not establish: This does not establish that the same model would suit a task requiring long reasoning or several chained steps, a use case for which a deeper model in the same family is recommended.
The three most common miscalibrations
- Too broad The fastest model in the range is just as well suited to tasks requiring several complex reasoning steps.
- Too narrow This choice allows nothing at all to be affirmed, a single use case never being enough to confirm that a model matches its public description.
- Beside the point This choice guarantees that the association's inbox running costs will stay low this month.
- The four current Claude models share the same base training and are really only distinguished by a trade-off between answer speed and depth of reasoning.
- A deeper model does not handle a short task any better, it simply takes longer to come back on a question that did not need it.
- The documentation published by Anthropic recommends starting with Opus 5 for most tasks and reserving the deepest model for long reasoning.
- The price charged per million words exchanged follows the same axis as speed, and it goes out of date quickly, which is why it should be checked in the dated figure rather than memorised as a fixed number.
Note down on a sheet three tasks you regularly hand to your assistant, then sort each one under speed or under depth using the public description of each model, before changing your settings.
These points depend on an interface or a rule that may have changed since this was written. Check them on your own screen before relying on them.
- The exact price and model names can change, open the Models overview page cited in the references to see the version in force at the time you read this.
Every datable claim in this lesson links here to the public text behind it. A source that does not open proves nothing.
- Models overview consultée le 2026-09-02
- Pricing consultée le 2026-09-02